(This is the third part in a mini-series on the health and wealth gospel and what a missional response might be. Here is part one [CLICK HERE] and here is part two [CLICK HERE]. Be sure to check back for more! Or just subscribe to my blog using the sign-up form on the right or at the bottom of the page if you’re using your mobile device.)
After spending more time than I’d like to admit listening to health and wealth preachers, like Robert Tilton, Kenneth Copeland, Paula White, Joyce Meyer, Creflo Dollar, and the like, I’m simply dumbfounded at the way these men and women twist the words of the Bible to fit their needs.
They’re butchering the Bible. There’s really no other way of saying it.
And their butchering is always in full effect when they preach or teach on a certain passage from Mark. Here it is:
“Truly I tell you,” Jesus replied, “no one who has left home or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or fields for me and the gospel will fail to receive a hundred times as much in this present age: homes, brothers, sisters, mothers, children and fields—along with persecutions—and in the age to come eternal life. (Mark 10.29-30)
I’d rather not make you wonder if I was being fair by paraphrasing these health and wealth preachers. So I figured I’d let them speak for themselves, thus revealing their butchering ways totally on their own.
So, without further ado and in no particular order, here are some examples of the butchering Mark 10.29-30 by prosperity gospel preachers:
Robert Tilton (AKA the Farting Preacher): Tilton cites Mark 10.30 and builds a principle on it called “God’s Law of Compensation,” which he writes about in God’s Laws of Success. He says that God set this principle in motion back in the book of Genesis with Abraham and this “Law of Compensation” is “here in the earth” (page 142). In other words, God will give back to us here on earth what we give him, and then some. He has to. It’s a law after all!
Kenneth Copeland (AKA the Godfather of the Prosperity Gospel): Copeland wrote a book entitled Laws of Prosperity. In it he constantly refers to Mark 10:30 and its supposed hundredfold promised return on investment. And on page 58 he says this: “Do you want a hundredfold return on your money? Give and let God multiply it back to you. No bank in the world offers this kind of return! Praise the Lord!” Do you see that? He guarantees that if you give, then you’ll get back 100 times what you gave! That’s crazy!
Paula White: White is in same boat with Tilton and Copeland. However, she at least admits that there’s something funny in Mark 10.30, namely the word “persecution.” Here are her words describing what this persecution means:
Nobody said it would come easy. In fact, in Mark 10:28, Peter said, “We have left all.” And Jesus answered, “There is nothing you have left, not houses, not brothers, not sister, that you will not have a hundredfold return and eternal life in this life, with persecution.” That’ s the problem. God said, “You’re going to get it, but it’s going to come with persecution.” The enemy doesn’t want you to walk in it. That’s okay. Who cares about the giants in the land? Just go forth in grace. Go for your stuff. Go for your anointing. Go for your family. Go for your increase. Go for your supernatural abundance. [SOURCE]
So the persecution that Jesus promised would come is simply the enemy, AKA the devil, wanting us not to walk in God’s blessings. What does that mean? God will bless us with “stuff” and “increase” but the devil’s job is to prevent us from enjoying it? Instead of letting the devil do that, White wants us to go for what’s ours. That sounds pretty selfish to me.
Joyce Meyer: Meyer says that she wants us to know that “God wants us to manage our resources, not the other way around.” I can get behind that. Let’s see what managing our resources look like according to Meyer? Well, she gives some pretty good advice, like work hard and save your money. But then she also draws on the same idea that there’s some sort of a law forcing God’s hand when you give:
Whatever you give up now will come back to you one-hundred-fold in this lifetime (see Mark 10:29-30). If you want to have an abundant life, then I encourage you to ask God to help you live generously. [SOURCE]
So two things: 1) It looks like she ignores the persecution part of Mark 10.30 altogether. Instead she focuses on the hundredfold blessing that is activated by giving and is repaid financially. 2) She seems to be encouraging people’s natural propensity for wanting more and more and more — “If you want to have the abundant life…” Who doesn’t? Meyer is simply picking the low-hanging fruit of human sinfulness here.
Creflo Dollar (AKA The $60 Million Dollar Jet Man): According to the hundredfold math, I wonder what Dollar gave in order to think he was going to get that jet. Let’s see, $60 million divided by 100 equals…$600 thousand. Now if there were investments this successful, then we’d all be living it up the Scrooge McDuck! (Did he actually live it up? I don’t remember…) In a study note entitled “The Law that Governs Abundance,” Dollar claims that in order to live the abundant life we must obey God. Obeying connects us to God’s blessings and disobedience does the opposite. He ends this particular study note with these two lines:
It is okay to have riches, but we should never trust in them (Psalm 52:7).
Anything we give up for Jesus will be returned to us a hundredfold in this lifetime (Mark 10:29, 30). [SOURCE]
So being rich if fine but don’t trust in it. But just in case you need to be tempted to trust in riches, give up lots of stuff for Jesus so that it will be returned to you times 100. Then you’ll find out first hand if it’s hard to never trust in riches! Again, notice that there’s no mention of the persecution in Mark 10.30.
After looking at each example of butchering of Mark 10:30, what do we see? What do each of these readings have in common?
Well, giving apparently forces God to multiply what we gave up for him by 100. It appears that he must do it! And apparently we all should be seeking after the abundant life, meaning a life full of stuff and increase. And the way to get there, to that abundant life, is to manipulate God by taking advantage of his law of compensation.
Ugh. All this butchering makes me want to explore the text from Mark 10 myself.
Hopefully Not Butchering the Bible
So the five preachers that I pointed out above put their thoughts about things out there. So I guess I should do the same. Whether or not I’m guilty of butchering the Bible too is up to you to decide!
Here we go.
What is the context of Mark 10.29-30. Well, it appears in a larger section in which Jesus was teaching. At the beginning of chapter 10 he’s teaching about divorce (such an easy topic these days!). And, as he’s teaching, people are bringing him their children. Even though the disciples are annoyed by this, Jesus welcomes it, even saying that folks must receive the kingdom of God like a child in order to enter it.
After chillin’ with the kiddos for a bit, Jesus starts on his way, presumably to leave, when a man runs up, falls on his knees before Jesus, and begins a conversation. He asks “What do I have to do to really live, to have eternal life?” Jesus tells him that he needs to keep the commands from the Old Testament. The man says he’s done so since he was a child.
Then Jesus looked at him and loved him. I love that line. What would it have meant for this man to be loved in this way? And then think about what Jesus is about to ask of this man! Jesus asks something hard, but does so in love.
And what is that hard thing that Jesus asks of this man? It’s simply this: Sell all your stuff, give the proceeds to the poor, and follow me.
The man got really sad and left. It should be noted that we don’t know what he actually did next. Did this man go back to his previous way of life? Or did he actually sell it all in obedience to Jesus? We don’t know!
Whatever the case, Jesus uses this interaction as a teaching moment for his disciples. He says to them “How hard it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of God!”
Now we should pause here for a moment. This idea flies in the face of a lot of what we read earlier by the health and wealth preachers. If it’s hard to enter the kingdom for the rich, why would we follow the advice of the prosperity preachers by giving in faith so that we can get 100 times back? Would all that money make it harder for us to follow God well?
In any case, Jesus continues. He says again how entering the kingdom of God is hard and follows that up with this doozy: “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”
Wow! Again, why would I want to pursue being rich if it might prevent me from living under the rule of God? I’ll take not-rich instead!
The disciples are shocked and wonder among themselves who could be saved then if the rich can’t. Jesus answers by saying that what seems impossible to us humans, is no big deal to God. All things are possible for God.
So the disciples are hearing all of this and they must be thinking that Jesus is calling them to sacrifice more, which seems a bit unfair. So Peter says, paraphrasing, “Jesus, no thanks. We’ve left everything to follow you. What’s in it for us?”
Jesus’ answer is perfect:
“Truly I tell you,” Jesus replied, “no one who has left home or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or fields for me and the gospel will fail to receive a hundred times as much in this present age: homes, brothers, sisters, mothers, children and fields—along with persecutions—and in the age to come eternal life.” (Mark 10.29-30)
So within the larger story, these two verses begin to make more sense. The disciples have literally left their families behind for the sake of following Jesus and they’ve left the land where they grew food for their families. Now what? Jesus must surely be aware that they’re feeling this way, because this is exactly where he goes.
So those who have lost relationships and property will receive one hundred times what they have lost. How? How does this work? We know for a fact that the disciples didn’t receive 100 times what they gave up. They all died horrifically, while being more or less impoverished. This can’t be a literal a literal tit-for-(100)-tats, or we would have know about it. There’d be stories of Thomas living it up in India and Peter building a palace to rival Caesar’s in Rome. But we don’t have stories like that. Instead we have stories of faithful men dying for their faith.
So something else must be in play here — namely, community. Jesus seems to be saying, at least the way I read it, that the relationships and securit,y which are sometimes given up as the cost of following Jesus, are expertly replaced by members of the community that God is creating.
But just in case anyone thought all of this shared community and security would bring peace of mind and assurance with it, Jesus tells his disciples that persecution is on the way. This is no get-rich-quick scheme. No! Instead this is Jesus giving his closest followers a glimpse into the reality that they’ll be facing.
The picture Jesus paints here is nothing like that which is drawn by the health and wealth gospel people. Jesus seems to be saying this: Being rich can be a major hindrance to following Jesus. So instead of pursuing that, let’s follow Jesus despite the cost, trusting that he’ll take care of our needs for relationship and relative security.
There is no explicit formula in play here. This isn’t a “give a seed offering of 100 dollars and watch God give you 10,000 bucks back!” Quite the opposite. What Jesus has in mind in this passage is a deep trust that whatever God wants to give us through the community he is creating is enough. Nothing else is needed.
Butchering the Bible: Why?
I’m going to presume some things in this section. If you don’t like that, move right along.
Here’s my method: I’m going to try to think like a prosperity gospel proponent for a moment and decipher why they may be so into this “Law of Compensation” as Robert Tilton calls it. Here we go:
So I just read in Mark 10.29-30 that if you give stuff up to follow Jesus then he’ll return it to you one hundred fold. Now I know this isn’t true in my life because I’ve never really seen it. But I bet if I used just the right preaching tactics and invested enough time building my brand and image that I could convince other people that this was true.
Bingo! That’s it! I’ll start trying to convince folks that if they give then they’ll get back what they’ve given times 100! But I don’t want to encourage them to give anywhere or to anyone. No. I want them to give to my ministry, especially since I am its sole proprietor my board is made up of my spouse, my first lieutenant, and me.
But hold on, this get-back-100-times thing doesn’t really work. How will I convince people to keep at it, even when it isn’t happening for them? I know, I’ll tell them that they have to believe, REALLY believe, that God will do what he promises in Mark 10.30. I’ll say, “You have to believe for the return or God won’t give it!” That’s right; I’ll make belief a type of magic that people will try to use to get what they want from God. But since this 100-times thing doesn’t really work, people will just keep giving, hoping that this time they are believing just right so that God has to bless them.
Perfect! Now off to the studio to record my next sermon!
Now I’m not going to pretend for a second that I actually know what is going on in the minds of the people who preach this non-sense, but I can definitely see the logic in my little pretend scenario above. Can’t you? Can’t you see the ease with which this line of thinking, namely that God will give you a hundredfold what you give up for him if you really believe it, can be used to manipulate people into giving more money? Can’t you see the temptation here?
Butchering a Conclusion
Here’s my point: In a quick and dirty reading of some health and wealth preachers like Robert Tilton, Kenneth Copeland, Paula White, Joyce Meyer, and Creflo Dollar it is obvious that they are misusing Mark 10.29-30. They ignore the context, or misappropriate it, and they tend to ignore the presence of the word “persecution,” or they interpret it really strangely.
So the loosey-goosey way they handle this text makes me wonder what they do with passages like Jeremiah 29.11 or the covenant with Abraham in Genesis 12 or other passages that can, on the surface at least, be bent into a prosperity matrix? My guess, which is a really-well-informed guess by the way, is that they do the same things there that they do here in Mark 10.
Who cares though? What’s the problem with this? I already talked about this in a previous post so I’ll just repeat the basic idea here: We should care about the prosperity Gospel because it is used to exploit the poor here in North America and all across the world, including some of the poorest places in South America, Africa, and Asia. That’s why this matters. That’s why we should care.
What do you think? Are these preachers onto something with their you’ll-get-back-100-times-what-you-give-up teaching? Or are they way off base? Let me know in the comments below!
And if you liked this post, then please share it with your friends! Just use the little buttons below! Thanks!